PART III | DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST OFFICERS |
| Disciplinary proceedings against officers |
17.—(1) If a complaint of misconduct is made against an officer, the Commanding Officer shall cause the complaint to be investigated by an officer more senior than the officer who is being investigated or by a police officer of or above the rank of Inspector (referred to in these Regulations as the investigator).| (2) The investigator shall examine the complaint and submit a report to the Commanding Officer. If the Commanding Officer after considering the report of the investigator is of the view that the complaint warrants disciplinary proceedings to be taken against the officer, he shall appoint a Disciplinary Board (referred to in these Regulations as the Board) to hear and determine the complaint. |
(3) The Board shall consist of the following members:| (a) | a chairman who shall be the Commandant or a police officer of or above the rank of Superintendent; and | | (b) | two officers of or above the rank of Assistant Commandant in the Corps or two police officers of or above the rank of Assistant Superintendent; or | | (c) | an officer in the Corps of or above the rank of Assistant Commandant and a police officer of or above the rank of Assistant Superintendent. |
|
| (4) The officer concerned may appeal to the Commanding Officer against the composition of the Board as being prejudicial to an impartial inquiry. If the Commanding Officer is satisfied that there are good grounds for the objection, he shall alter the composition of the Board. |
| (5) The Board shall serve on the accused a notice containing a copy of the charge. The accused shall be required to state in writing within a time specified in the notice whether he admits or denies the charge. |
| (6) The Commanding Officer shall appoint a police officer of or above the rank of Inspector or an officer in the Corps to present the case for the prosecution to the Board. |
| (7) At the hearing before the Board, the accused may appear in person or may be represented by an officer in the Corps. |
| (8) If the accused denies the charge, or if he fails to state in writing whether he admits or denies the charge within the time specified in the notice, the Board shall fix a time and date and a place where the charge will be inquired into and shall notify the accused accordingly. |
| (9) If the accused without reasonable justification fails to attend at the time and date and place so fixed, the Board may proceed to determine the charge against the accused in his absence. |
|
18. At the inquiry the following procedure shall be observed:| (a) | the charge shall be read and explained to the accused and he shall be asked to plead to the charge and his plea shall be recorded; | | (b) | if there are two or more charges he shall be called upon to plead separately to each charge and each plea shall be separately recorded in respect of each charge; | | (c) | the prosecuting officer shall examine the prosecution witnesses and the accused shall be permitted to cross-examine any of the prosecution witnesses; | | (d) | the accused shall be permitted to give evidence on his own behalf and may call witnesses in his defence; | | (e) | the accused and his witnesses may be cross-examined by the prosecuting officer; | | (f) | the evidence of each witness at the inquiry need not ordinarily be recorded in the form of question and answer and may be taken down in the form of a narrative; | | (g) | after the conclusion of the inquiry, the Board shall submit a report of its findings and recommendations to the Commanding Officer. The Commanding Officer shall consider the report and mitigation (if any), and if he is satisfied that the charge against the accused has been proved, impose on the accused any of the punishments specified in section 17(1) of the Act. |
|
| 19. A charge may be amended at any time before the Board makes its findings. The charge, if amended, shall be read and explained to the officer and he shall be called upon to plead anew to the amended charge and to justify any demand he may make for additional time to prepare his defence. |
| 20. The Board may adjourn the inquiry at any time if it considers it necessary in the interest of justice. |
| Admissibility of evidence |
| 21. At the hearing, the Board or the Disciplinary Officer shall not be bound to act in a formal manner and shall not be bound by the provisions of the Evidence Act [Cap. 97] or by any other law relating to evidence but may inform itself or himself on any matter in such manner as it or he thinks fit. |
| 22. The Board may regulate the procedure at any inquiry under this Part as it thinks fit. |
| 23. If the accused admits the charge, the Board shall submit a report of its findings and recommendations to the Commanding Officer. The Commanding Officer shall consider the report and mitigation (if any), and may impose on the accused any of the punishments specified in section 17(1) of the Act. |
24.—(1) Where a complaint made against an officer is in the opinion of the Commanding Officer of a minor nature, the Commanding Officer may, instead of appointing a Board pursuant to regulation 17(2), appoint a Disciplinary Officer to hear and determine the complaint.| (2) The Disciplinary Officer referred to in paragraph (1) shall be a police officer of or above the rank of Assistant Superintendent or an officer in the Corps holding a rank higher than that held by the alleged offender. |
| (3) The procedure to be followed at the hearing referred to in paragraph (1) shall be the same as that adopted by a Disciplinary Officer at the hearing of a subordinate officer under Part II. |
| (4) If the accused admits the charge, the Disciplinary Officer shall submit a report of his findings and recommendations to the Commanding Officer. The Commanding Officer shall consider the report and may, after considering any mitigation made by the accused, impose on the accused any of the punishments specified in section 17(1) of the Act. |
| (5) Where the accused does not admit the charge, the Disciplinary Officer shall, after conducting the hearing referred to in paragraph (1), submit a report of his findings and recommendations to the Commanding Officer. The Commanding Officer shall consider the report and mitigation (if any), and if he is satisfied that the charge against the accused has been proved, impose on the accused any of the punishments specified in section 17(1) of the Act. |
|
| 25. An officer who is dissatisfied with any decision made by a Commanding Officer under regulation 18(g), 24(4) or 24(5) may appeal to the Commissioner against that decision in accordance with section 17(2) of the Act. |
|